I have been reading "Body by Science" by Dr. Doug McGuff and John Little. The book is awesome, but it left me with some questions. Doug was kind enough to answer them on his blog and I am reposting here. My questions were more application specific and avoids all the other questions that have already been discussed elsewhere with interviews with him. I buy into the high intensity stuff and now "get it" that slower is more intense. One workout showed me that. Many thanks to Doug for responding. The responses really are going to help me integrate this training method into my life and I look forward to the benefits.
Q1) What are appropriate activites for recovery period(during the week). I am interested in doing a few functional skills. I am getting that doing somewhat similar activites to something “real world” may not translate, but I want to be able to do these types of things well(tennis, sprinting, & climbing). How can I work these things into my recovery so as to not ruin the recovery? I am ok if the anwer is “don’t do it, just rest and recover”.
A1) Whatever activities you have the urge to do. Your really intense workout is to give you the desire and capability to pursue these interests with greater performance and safety. Because brief/infrequent is required it is not a big deal to fit in other things. I love BBS-type workouts, but I encourage everyone to fit the workout around your activities/skills rather than fitting your activities around your workout. The only consideration is to allow enough days to pass so that you can perform well. Most skill activities are not of such high intensity that they will significantly erode into recovery. If so, an extra recovery day or two (or three) will compensate and will introduce a more stochastic pattern to your hard BBS workouts.
Q2) Variation/Intermittancy. Every week seems very regular. Does it make sense to have some variation?
A2)Yes, that variation will occur in conjunction with your other sports/activities and normal disruptions of life (see #1 above).
Q3) Other regions of the power law? Super Slow HIT is no doubt the highest intensity spot, as I now know. How to integrate other areas of the power law? Is it needed?
A3) See page 158, this is an example of how you can tweak this kind of workout to have some power law variation. If you want to truly make it random, you can draw these variations from a hat. More importantly, I think of the BBS-type workout as the very peak of the power law continuum, with your other activities (sport and daily life) as the random peaks and valleys below this sharp spike. Think of this really hard workout as a kind of “positive black swan” that leaves a favorable metabolic footprint. With this archetype in mind, I wonder if the frequency might need to be even less. John is collecting BodPod data on subjects after a Big 5 workout and is finding an initial lean mass peak at 6-7 days, then another larger peak around 26 days…just grist for the mill.
Q4) Fasting. What are thoughts on fasting during recovery and before/after WOW? I usually fast 2x/wk for 24 hours. Will this hurt recovery? Should I save the fasting for certain times for optimal results?
A4) I like the concept of fasting and I personally like to go into my WOW in a fasted state. Our ancestors likely did their highest intensity exertion during a hunt which was likely to be in a fasted state. This theoretically augments glycogen emptying and enhances amino acid turnover. Since most cell regeneration occurs during fasted low energy states, I think IF should enhance recovery.
Q5) Is there any way to speed recovery? I have heard contrast showers of hot and cold may help. I am skeptical, but I thought I would ask.
A5) In my experience the best enhancers of recovery and response to any program are as follows: Belief in your approach. If you feel confident about your plan, it will work much better. If you look at the therapeutic effect of the most powerful drugs, 40% of that effect is attributed to the placebo effect. Next, getting adequate sleep and being well-hydrated go a LONG way. Also, not being under significant stress elsewhere (work, financial, relationships) improves recovery. Finally, not cultivating training angst by ruminating about your workouts. Get in, focus and work hard, then get on with your life. I’ve heard the hot/cold shower thing from Tim Ferriss (www.fourhourworkweek.com), but I’ve not tried it or seen any literature to support or refute it.
Q6) Does it make sense to kick start gains by doing 2x/wk until plateau then drop to 1x/wk?
A6) If you go to the recommended trainers section and look at the graph that Ryan Hall has posted (it didn’t turn out right in the book) you can see the curve of 2X vs 1X training. Initially 2X is a steeper rate of improvement, but it quickly trails off. With the other functional skills you wish to pursue, I think your workouts might crowd out the fun stuff.
Q7) Opposite of the “gym rats” problem. Some may be relcutant to employ this method of super slow intense exercise since it clearly is hard to do and “extremly tiring”. Not me, but others feel that way. Is there benefit in doing slow reps but not to full failure? Would you change the exercise frequency in that case?
A7) The safety benefits of slow reps are always an advantage, particularly with those with less gifted “protoplasm”. Further, even if not going to failure, it will be so much more intense than anything else such a person would do, it is still a quantum leap in the right direction for this kind of person. With lower intensity, a higher frequency can be tolerated, but 2 times per week is probably adequate and all that such a subject would want.
Q8) Have you looked into movnat? Any thoughts on how to work those “skills” into a regimen without compromising recovery?
A8) I have seen the movnat website and the old movies of its originator. It is cool looking stuff. Being Tarzan has its dangers though, but I would like to cultivate those kind of skills. They are like carrying a gun…you may never need them, but if you ever do you will REALLY need them. WRT its effect on recovery, see my answer to question #1.
Q9) Did a Big 5 to full positive failure(maybe negative…) on Saturday. On tuesday, 3 days later, I am finally feeling back to baseline. I was pretty weak for about 48 hours or so. Is this common? Should I expect this as a pattern for future WOWs?
A9) As your metabolic condition improves, you will begin to feel normal by day 1 or 2. Then you will get stronger and may get back to the 3 (or more) day window. When this happens you need to modulate volume/frequency/intensity. There is no need to feel hammered for 3 or 4 days. I used to perform deep inroad (pushing as hard as possible at failure for 10-15 seconds until the movement arm drags you through failure), now I stop immediately at failure and recover much better and have better results.
9 comments:
Thanks for sharing that!!!
Great stuff.
I attempted my first BBS work out this morning.....
as Jim Carey says in Liar Liar
"HOLY HELL"!!!!!!!
I was trembling and twitching like a maniac and after seated rows, I was exhausted.
I skimmed the book, and now reading with attention this week.
Marc
Good post Jeff,
One of the other questions I was thinking about was regarding the specificity topic - i.e., how running for example does not translate to biking.
So, by doing the big 5 does that mean that other exercises will decline? If I only do leg presses, will my squat weight decrease for example? That may be a poor choice for exercise comparison, but I think you get the point.
Andy,
Good question. Yup, specificity applies everywhere. If you want to apply your strength to squats, you have to rehearse the motor skills of squatting. Either treat your squatting a supplemental skill work, or use squats in your strength building workout.
Doug Mcguff
This is excellent. Thanks to both Jeff and Dr. McGuff.
Not sure if Doug is still following this post. If so - thanks a bunch for your input. If not, I'll post the question on his site.
My next question is in regard to fiber fatigue and dropout. How does one acheive full in-roads with exercises involving compound movements and recruits various muscle groups? It seems like the exercise would be limited by when a certain percentage completely fatigue, while other less heavily recruited fibers may only be at 2 of 4 fiber types fatigued?
It seems like one could get the majority of fibers to fatigue through the use of more isolation-type exercises, but I've had the belief that compound movements are more beneficial. I suppose an alternative would be to incorporate more (i.e., > the big 5) exercises for an exercise routine. Any thoughts?
Doug,
I am confused a bit by the response to Andy's question regarding specificity. My understanding of the once a week HIT was to create overall general strength that are available for any specificity. Is this not the case?
A more detailed example would be to compare someone off the street who does no training versus someone who does HIT the BBS way and compare them in their squat capability. Let's assume that neither do any squatting at all. The HIT/BBS person does leg press only along with the other exercises. The general strength by the BBS/HIT person should be far higher and that should translate into a better squat performance. Is that right?
Now if we are talking about someone who trains for a competitive event for squat then I get it that you need to practice the exact exercise. Doing HIT/BBS leg press would not be optimal for that specificity.
So, in other words, doing the leg press did nothing for the SKILL of doing the squat but did provide a general STRENGTH that could be utilized by any specificity, including the squat.
Am I correct in my understanding? To be honest, the specificity idea from your book was a challenging to me as almost anything else in the book. I have personal anecdotes that support this for sure. I will need to post on that sometime.
Andy,
Recruitment is more related to the load and intensity. If both are high enough, almost everything that is involved in that movement gets recruited.
Jeff,
You are correct in your assumptions. I was referring to squatting competitively to demonstrate strength (or simply the use of the squat as one's yardstick for strength). The Big 5 does provide generalized strength and conditioning that you can apply to many different specific activities.
Doug McGuff
Good interview Jeff.
Chris
Please, give me link to download XRumer 7.0!!!
Thanks!
Always yours,
miss MW
Post a Comment